Some of the previous edition's top recommendations have been superseded by new items or newer versions. This format is also more easily transportable than its larger sibling, making it an ideal choice for keyboard players and pianists that want a touring controller without taking up cargo space where every square inch counts. Others who are used to full pianos might go for 88-Key MIDI Controllers.Ħ1-Key MIDI Keyboard Controllers are best for those who need a wide note range but would otherwise not have the studio space to fit a full 88-Key MIDI Controller. Others find that they prefer more compact 25-Key MIDI Controllers or 49-Key MIDI Controllers. Portable Keyboards - MIDI Enabled Under $500įinding the "Goldilocks" gear that fits just right with your needs gets confusing the more you read or learn about a product you're interested in, the more you'd want to compare that product with others and it becomes difficult to weigh the pros and cons of each.įor MIDI Keyboard controllers, the challenge is finding out which size fits your needs as well as your studio.The one I use is But it's no longer available. If you google "optical to analog converter" you'll find a bunch of options. So when I said earlier I've had success with theis approach this is what I was talking about. Lower CPU overhead = the ability to run at lower latencies when a lot is being asked of the computer. While I've not done any serious testing my experiences tell me that because the built in interface is so simple and optimised it runs with lower CPU overhead than pretty much any external interface. Since the AD/DA converters are of less quality than even the cheapest external interface have, this optical feature provides an opportunity to get high quality digital stream out of the mac and do the analog conversion via external converters. Plugin an analog connector and the mac will send/ receive analog audio, plugin an optical connector and the mac knows and will input/ output optical digital audio signals. What many don't know is that the built in interface can input/output analog or optical digital audio from the small connectors provided. Most know (obviously) that the mac has a built in sound card or audio interface otherwise how would mac output it's audio. If you needed midi ports you purchase a 1x1 interface for very little money. If you have a recent MacBook Pro and decent ram you should expect to run at a 32 sample buffer setting in main stages driver settings. I've had great low latency performance from a mac going this way. This box effectively uses the macs built in audio interface but puts better quality converters on the end than the built in converters. You will be lucky if you can purchase any of those better brands smallest models within your budget.ĪNother solution is to purchase an optical to analog converter box instead. MOTU has a better rep and best of all are RME and Metric Halo with maybe Apogee up there as well. If your demands of mainstage are higher then the quality of the interface's driver and the CPU overhead the driver imposes is going to impact how low you can go with latency.įocusrite do not have a good rep in this area. so if your demands on mainstage are mild then you will run at lower latency no matter which brand of interface you use. How low you can go ultimately depends your computer's CPU ability. Sounds to me like you should be most concerned with low latency performance.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |